logo
 Username:  Password:  
Remember me ( ?)

sir_quirky_k ([info]sir_quirky_k) wrote,
@ 2008-04-23 07:54:00

Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry

Exciting month ahead
To-day, it is - perhaps remarkably - my first full 90-minute football commentary, covering a match between teams from Surge (Southampton Uni radio) and Sin (Southampton Poly radio). The footage will be edited into a highlights package placed online.

I'm honestly terribly nervous about this; I've been thinking in recent weeks that my voice isn't all that suited to commentary, and then it struck me. Something that perhaps ties into my confusion over my singing voice, too.

I tend to speak higher in my range than most people. Implication; if I'm naturally speaking quite high as it is, I have far less room to go up in pitch, and my expression suffers, especially in commentary where deviations in pitch (and volume) from normal speech will consistently skew upwards.

Tricky. But I do have the lower range, I just need to speak more consistently in it. Terribly unsure here, and I suspect my lesson with Helen in two hours will be quite illuminating. I could really do with speaking to one of my friends in musical theatre, to be honest...

...which links into the next event (other than the already-mentioned Circle Line Challenge). The Mennyms starts a four-night run on May 7. I will be either at the first night, or operating the lighting desk for part or all of the run; I have been assured that the Wrong Kind of Shiny is not an issue.

(It is, however, for the light opera group's production of Cox and Box next week, which contains a lightning effect; however, I have been told that as this is an entirely isolated scene, it will be possible to usher me away for that scene, allowing me to watch the rest. As Cox and Box is in one act, a revue of Gilbert and Sullivan songs forms a second act, and there's potential Shiny issues there too. I shall delay my ticket-purchasing until I have heard from someone at the technical run-through; there will be someone I know there.)

Couldn't ask for better timing to end my jealousy; the new writing showcase is the very next week, and my piece has been confirmed as in it. The show's format is single-player Greed with three correct answers for each high-value question - the intention is that it's recognisable as a fairly generic quiz without being any specific show (it's a bit more subtle than Gold Rush, anyway). Yes, that does mean a financial decision before the question, which is what makes the gamble clearly attributable to the Edmondsesque host and the player's inability to ignore him. There's also a deliberately steep prize tree - £100-£300-£1k-£3k-£9k-£25k-£75k-£250k, although values 1-3 and 5 are not mentioned, and 6 is only alluded to in the closing monologue - the show cuts straight to the decision before Q8, which is placed at the start of a new show. Spot the unintentional irony; if Steve Devlin had had an Edmondsesque host to prod him, he'd have had a million, as if memory serves he had a very good idea of the correct answer to Q15 but was put off by the drop to £32,000.

But we can't understand quite what it's like to be in that situation. An unexpected commenter can. Note his second comment, in which the contrast between Celador and Endemol is made all too clear.

And that, of course, leads us back to where we were. The closing monologue sees the contestant refer to the producers showing clear disdain for the lack of top-prize winners, and generally asserting a toxic studio atmosphere. In a somewhat more subtle reference, I've been writing some incidental music for the show, and the music at the point of financial decision is quite deliberately a piano-and-vibraphone loop. The question think loop is primarily a cello drone with the obligatory heartbeat thrown in, and a harp thrown in every eight bars. If you think that's my way of mourning the lost Q11-Q14 music from the original Strachan score, you'd be correct. The introductory music, all annoying strings and beats, is nearly complete, and I just have a few short stabs to finish.

The auditions for the show are next Tuesday, I shall be auditioning as an actor for other roles as well. I don't expect to get in, but it's a good opportunity to practice using my voice.

Then there's our choral concert. Amazing experience - we'll be in the campus concert hall that looks a bit like the Bad Shirt Casino with an organ, less neon and no manipulative floor manager, we'll be performing a choir-and-orchestra piece written by a music student here whom I actually approached for a collaboration last year that never happened, and then there's the small matter of one of my pieces being performed in public for the first time, and the whole thing will be recorded and put on CD too! - and it should be an absolutely wonderful night.

It'll have to be. The date... Saturday... May... 24.

Oh, how frustrating! It starts at 7:30pm, so that's basically the whole of the show missed, though not the voting. I'll at least be able to tell others about what we've all missed, because I shall watch both semi-finals and probably join [info]gizensha in the Commentariat. Oh, there's a nice way to loop back to where we begun.


(Post a new comment)


[info]daweaver
2008-04-23 05:17 pm UTC (link)
my first full 90-minute football commentary, covering a match between teams from Surge (Southampton Uni radio) and Sin (Southampton Poly radio).

Well, good luck. Not that you'll need it; you wouldn't be considered for the commentary if someone didn't think you were up to the job.

The Mennyms starts a four-night run on May 7. I will be either at the first night, or operating the lighting desk for part or all of the run; I have been assured that the Wrong Kind of Shiny is not an issue.

Again, may Gobo be your best friend Fraggle.

the new writing showcase is the very next week, and my piece has been confirmed as in it.

Ooh, jolly good.

The show's format is single-player Greed with three correct answers for each high-value question - the intention is that it's recognisable as a fairly generic quiz without being any specific show (it's a bit more subtle than Gold Rush, anyway).

...being hit over the head with a large steam-hammer is more subtle than Gold Rush...

The closing monologue sees the contestant refer to the producers showing clear disdain for the lack of top-prize winners, and generally asserting a toxic studio atmosphere.

Again, short on the subtlety, but then you are introducing a concept that might well be alien to most of the audience. In that instance, subtle is your enemy.

In a somewhat more subtle reference, I've been writing some incidental music for the show, and the music at the point of financial decision is quite deliberately a piano-and-vibraphone loop.

Which, I suggest, is the only part of Deal or No Deal worth salvaging after the Bad Shirt Casino caves in under its own fatuousness. Do moles still thrive underground?

Then there's our choral concert. We'll be performing a choir-and-orchestra piece written by a music student here whom I actually approached for a collaboration last year that never happened, and then there's the small matter of one of my pieces being performed in public for the first time, and the whole thing will be recorded and put on CD too! - and it should be an absolutely wonderful night.

Sounds like it, too.

Saturday... May... 24.

Whisper it softly, I suspect that the two semi-finals will prove to be more entertaining than the grand final, not least because we won't have to sit through more voting than songing.

If I'm not mistaken, you'll be able to watch the contest via the BBC or EBU websites, and Listen Against to the UK radio commentary. If you're really clever, you may yet work out how to record RTÉ's live radio commentary from over the interwebs (and if you do, please tell...)

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]sir_quirky_k
2008-04-26 10:31 am UTC (link)
Commentary: went well enough. An attempt to get 90 minutes of action onto one 60-minute tape caused us to miss two goals, mind, and the cameraman missed another through just totally losing track of the ball. All these goals were for Sin. The final score? Surge 2, Sin 5. Wonder if the online coverage will edit out all references to those three goals? ;)

Again, may Gobo be your best friend Fraggle.

*laughs*

More likely I'll be involved with the Showcase than Mennyms from a technical point now, but I will at the very least be a paying customer on the first night of the latter.

...being hit over the head with a large steam-hammer is more subtle than Gold Rush...

*laughs again* Yes, quite. Ripping off a format that nobody knew about when it was on, let alone seven years later, that's different.

And yes, this audience is going to need cluebatting. Most of them still watch Noel's Gambling Party, and most of them probably don't realise what the eponymous host is doing. Incidentally, the contestants do, and have become much more cautious of late; that plus a run of bad luck has left the mean winnings so far this year at £12,500 per show, a full four grand short of the long-run average, with the largest box win being £35,000 - to a self-confessed gambler who received six offers even I would have rejected. One has to wonder if this is a barometer for the recession that is arriving (has arrived?), at least in terms of changing the way people value money.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

A taxi is far cheaper
[info]daweaver
2008-04-28 05:46 pm UTC (link)
Commentary: went well enough. An attempt to get 90 minutes of action onto one 60-minute tape caused us to miss two goals, and the cameraman missed another through just totally losing track of the ball.

So you've got the job working for Sky?

Most of them still watch Noel's Gambling Party,

Good grief, is that still on? I can't recall the last time someone asked after it.

One has to wonder if this is a barometer for the recession that is arriving (has arrived?), at least in terms of changing the way people value money.

Question (and one to which I don't know the answer): when were the episodes taped? I think it's only in the last couple of months that the economic downturn has really hit home to Jo Public. Edmonds is so fabulously wealthy as to think that interest rates should rise, so the millions of quid he's got in the bank can earn even more interest.

Actually, how much is Edmonds's pile gathering him? The latest figures suggest he has a personal fortune of the order of £75 million; assuming a 5% rate of interest per annum, and each episode of Gambling Party takes 90 minutes to film, he's receiving about £540 in interest just while he's playing his guessing game. A two-minute conversation with Glenn nets him a tenner.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: A taxi is far cheaper
[info]sir_quirky_k
2008-04-28 08:55 pm UTC (link)
The first episodes taped after the Northern Rock crisis aired at the end of October. Currently aired episodes were filmed in January; episodes recorded now are due for airing in (wait for it) late September.

Goodness, I'm not going to work for a west London arm of the Murdoch corporation. But yes, my commentary went down well and the problems around me were quite amusing in retrospect. A rematch is planned for after the exam season, and that is a significant incentive to stay in Southampton for as long as possible. Before that, there's a contest between representatives of AU teams modelled on (and using the name of) Superstars. Seen the event list, and lawks is it ever skewed - there's a few skill events (basketball shots, the player-vs-goalie challenge from the revival) and the famous gym tests (with press-ups replacing dips, alas), but the majority of the events are annoyingly similar cardiovascular challenges (a race on exercise bikes! A race on rowing machines! An 800m foot race! Two swimming races, one a relay!) that the winners will almost certainly be those with the best speed endurance over periods of a few minutes. That would be the rowers, then. Though whether we're using the 'teams drop out of one event and are yanked out of another' rules, I don't know yet.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: A taxi is far cheaper
[info]daweaver
2008-05-01 05:16 pm UTC (link)
Goodness, I'm not going to work for a west London arm of the Murdoch corporation.

Ah, it's the amateurish nature of the output that led me down that garden path - missing three goals is almost down to the level of incompetence we have come to expect from Harlington.

Before that, there's a contest between representatives of AU teams modelled on (and using the name of) Superstars.

It's a shame they haven't got any actual canoes to go paddling in the harbour, or a proper cycle up the hill (he said, assuming that Southampton has a decent hill *somewhere*. They're more than welcome to take one of the ones from round here...)

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: A taxi is far cheaper
[info]sir_quirky_k
2008-06-05 06:21 pm UTC (link)
Aha, here we go! The commentary is up!

(Reply to this)(Parent)


copyright IziBlog.Net © 2008 | View settings | Terms of service