logo
 Username:  Password:  
Remember me ( ?)

sir_quirky_k ([info]sir_quirky_k) wrote,
@ 2008-05-08 15:17:00

Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry

The Mennyms world premiere: oh, the jealousy
Last night was the night I'd chalked in as a night for envious glances for a long time. It was the first night of the first production of The Mennyms.

Envious glances at Lyndsay, of course, for she wrote it; and to a far lesser extent, the male cast members, all of whom usurped me on their way.

There were raffles for the Great Ormond Street Hospital in the foyer, including various guessing games (how many jelly beans in an overfilled 1kg tub, what's the name of the bear - my guess for the latter, almost mockingly, was Elphaba).

For some reason, songs from various incarnations of S Club greeted us as we entered the auditorium. I asserted that this was to make Lyndsay's music sound good. She was in the audience, as was Chris Allinson, as were several of my friends, including the producer Joey, who was my halls warden when I first arrived here, a WEAKEST LINK winner before that, and (by implication) someone whose response to my play I really, really want to hear.

The show began with a witty front-of-house announcement. No Quirks-unfriendly lighting warnings, not that such lighting would have put me off coming for this.

Cue the opening number, which was built around a motif of repeating quavers, jumping up briefly and heading straight back down again. The first and fourth quaver beats of every eight were emphasised, and in retrospect that's probably why I later envisioned a juxtaposition of it and the ITV NewsTabloid Myths music. Practically the whole of it was spoken; it was the reading of a letter from a mysterious 'Albert Pond' from Australia, who apparently wishes to buy the house in which the Mennyms - an anthropomorphised family of dolls - presently reside.

Cue various chaos from there, to be honest, along with some excellent singing from the male cast members while some of the female members struggled to be heard over the band. There were more cast members than there were portable microphones, the band was significant enough to make that an issue (two keyboards, a violin, a cello and an oboe with possibly something else, if memory serves), and that was a problem for the softer female voices. Interestingly, at least one cast member (whose part covered an extensive range, probably about two octaves - I did ask Lyndsay, and she couldn't remember off-hand) sounded clearer singing high, thus contravening the Brightman Rule. (A term I coined while speaking to Lyndsay about it, I think she was amused.)

A surprising lack of use of recurring motifs or reprises, though the ones that were there worked well; a distinct lack of male parts that did not have high notes (and now I know why I didn't get in; a G4 was a one-off fluke to me, but still not high enough for most musical theatre even if repeatable) probably worked well also, but is not something I intend to replicate in my own work.

All told, it was enjoyable. Only the opening motif stuck in my head, but no songs stood out as obviously bad, and the performance was generally good.

The new goal, which I informed Lyndsay of, is to write my musical in time for it to be performed two years hence. I believe the pitching of shows takes place in two waves, with the May show and June's '24-hour musical' (in which the cast and crew are only informed what show is being performed 24 hours before the first performance) confirmed at one meeting, and the two prior shows of the year (three, if you count the annual revue in December) confirmed at another. Goodness knows which I'll take. The second of the two earlier shows is the big show of the year, and it'll be in the professional theatre on campus (which puts on one show by the students per year, with the musical theatre, light opera and drama groups rotating the distinction - in that order, and it was the light opera group this year, so musical theatre in 2010), so it'll almost certainly be a well-known show with great reliance upon a largish stage and Quirks-unfriendly lighting. (Last year it was The Witches of Eastwick.)

I told Lyndsay that I intend to write the book, lyrics and music, and seek someone else for 'additional music and orchestration'. (The unspoken; potentially her. And just look at her, she can do all I couldn't do...)


(Post a new comment)

Admits six to eight
[info]daweaver
2008-05-09 05:45 pm UTC (link)
For some reason, songs from various incarnations of S Club greeted us as we entered the auditorium.

To this correspondent, the thought of S Club tends towards youth, vibrancy, newness, fun, and generally living life like it were a comic book. The majority of the audience would have been about twelve when ver Club were popular... It's a short-hand for a colourful, slightly off-kilter world without being so obvious as to use tinkly piano-and-xylophone compositions.

The show began with a witty front-of-house announcement.

Good. Front-of-house announcements are necessary, but that does not mean they must be boring.

The opening number was built around a motif of repeating quavers, jumping up briefly and heading straight back down again.

I'm thinking something closer to a child's music box that's slightly out of tune. (Showing my misspent youth here: theme to Secret Life of Toys).

wishes to buy the house in which the Mennyms - an anthropomorphised family of dolls - presently reside.

Ah-ha!

A surprising lack of use of recurring motifs or reprises, though the ones that were there worked well

Can one have a musical without a recurring theme?

Anyway. It is good to have goals, and it is gratifying to act upon them. I wish you well.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: Admits six to eight
[info]sir_quirky_k
2008-05-09 06:06 pm UTC (link)
It's a short-hand for a colourful, slightly off-kilter world without being so obvious as to use tinkly piano-and-xylophone compositions.

If that's the reasoning, it's brilliant. My guess was that it was to pick what was perceived as the worst of popular music, in order to make Lyndsay's work sound much better.

Can one have a musical without a recurring theme?

The closest I can offer is The Beggar's Opera, argued to be the origin of the genre of musical theatre (the reasoning behind it being performed by the light opera group earlier this year), but with not one recurring theme; the songs were all familiar ballads of the period, so in that sense it is closer to the revues-with-a-flimsy-plot that have proliferated in the 2000s.

Expect a large number of posts on the writing of the musical. Expect a separate tag for them, too, so that I can direct the interested towards those. Who knows, Lyndsay and/or Sarah-Jane and/or other people I've mentioned may well post... although the most remarkable comment I will ever receive on this blog has already happened.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

An update to this post, which I'm placing here
[info]sir_quirky_k
2008-05-17 03:31 am UTC (link)
The pitching of shows takes place this weekend (and presumably each May), excluding the '24-Hour Musical' (kept a secret from auditionees, revealed 24 hours before performance, a whole night and day to prepare the actors and technicians, only the band are in on the secret, it's always a show they can't get the performance rights to as by not revealing what the show is they can exploit what apparently is a loophole in performance rights) which is chosen in April (and performed in June), and the May show, which is pitched in December.

The pipedream; complete the musical by November, pitch it in December, it gets performed in the May before I graduate.

The safe outcome; it gets finished by the end of the decade, it gets performed in May 2010.

You can work out the outcome in between, which I think is the realistic target, and would almost certainly mean a February 2010 performance.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


copyright IziBlog.Net © 2008 | View settings | Terms of service